View Single Post
Old 08-14-2002, 12:26 PM   #80
choader
Root Cellar Dweller
 
choader's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 2,680
Thanks: 1,187
Thanked 1,471 Times in 584 Posts
choader has traveled the cannabinoid pathwaychoader has traveled the cannabinoid pathwaychoader has traveled the cannabinoid pathwaychoader has traveled the cannabinoid pathwaychoader has traveled the cannabinoid pathwaychoader has traveled the cannabinoid pathwaychoader has traveled the cannabinoid pathwaychoader has traveled the cannabinoid pathwaychoader has traveled the cannabinoid pathwaychoader has traveled the cannabinoid pathwaychoader has traveled the cannabinoid pathway
A missing piece

We are missing a piece of data. I think we have to account for area the light is shining over. Here's why.

IF, the EVL has 8900 lumens at 12", then:

Given E=I/D**2, with E=8900 and d=12", I=1281600

However, looking at the link from regularguy, it talks about the area over which the light shines. So the I number above could be total engery output, which would have to be divided over area.

If I use I=1281600, I get an E of 205056 lumens, which is an order of magnitude off. However, if that is truly energy out and you divide it over a 10" area, it comes out. But I think this is suspect.

Seems to me we are missing something or applying the equation wrongly, but close.

Let me look into this alittle more too. Now where's my Physics book????????????

Thanks.

Choader
choader is offline