View Single Post
Old 08-14-2002, 12:26 PM   #80
choader
Journal Slacker
 
choader's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 2,443
Thanks: 612
Thanked 986 Times in 379 Posts
choader has trimmed fields of budschoader has trimmed fields of budschoader has trimmed fields of budschoader has trimmed fields of budschoader has trimmed fields of budschoader has trimmed fields of budschoader has trimmed fields of budschoader has trimmed fields of budschoader has trimmed fields of budschoader has trimmed fields of budschoader has trimmed fields of buds
A missing piece

We are missing a piece of data. I think we have to account for area the light is shining over. Here's why.

IF, the EVL has 8900 lumens at 12", then:

Given E=I/D**2, with E=8900 and d=12", I=1281600

However, looking at the link from regularguy, it talks about the area over which the light shines. So the I number above could be total engery output, which would have to be divided over area.

If I use I=1281600, I get an E of 205056 lumens, which is an order of magnitude off. However, if that is truly energy out and you divide it over a 10" area, it comes out. But I think this is suspect.

Seems to me we are missing something or applying the equation wrongly, but close.

Let me look into this alittle more too. Now where's my Physics book????????????

Thanks.

Choader
choader is offline