Thread: HID vs. Fluoro
View Single Post
Old 08-20-2002, 10:37 AM   #7
rockclimber
HC.com Survivor
 
rockclimber's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: 29,035 feet above sea level.
Posts: 4,785
Thanks: 94
Thanked 452 Times in 224 Posts
rockclimber is just showing clear trichromesrockclimber is just showing clear trichromesrockclimber is just showing clear trichromesrockclimber is just showing clear trichromesrockclimber is just showing clear trichromesrockclimber is just showing clear trichromesrockclimber is just showing clear trichromesrockclimber is just showing clear trichromesrockclimber is just showing clear trichromesrockclimber is just showing clear trichromesrockclimber is just showing clear trichromes

HPS and MH are better just because of light penetration, that is all. Remember that every leaf absorbs 15% of usable light, so 5 leaves down there is not much light left. A HPS will penetrate deep into the canopy, say a 1000 watter. As for your argument, you are right; many persons on this board have used fluro with success. Just remember that the buds will be less dense, and therefore less heavy. Look into the EVL fluro light. Two members on this board have used them with great success so far.
rockclimber is offline