SargerasDragon

http://216.9.192.68/medical/pipe_study.php3

I would advise every person that uses this newsgroup to read this. It is, at the very least, extremely interesting.

Now that you have read it... I wonder about the thing they used to "smoke", it wasn't a person, and I wonder if any study like this could be done in any accurate way without using a person to smoke the greens? Also, this study makes generalizations for all bongs just from what they tested, and they seem to leave out any information about how you hit a different appiratus differently, and about how bongs can compress smoke more,and shove it down your longs faster, see, I don't know if the machine or whatever they used to smoke knows about this. So I am just all confused now, and would GREATLY apreciate hearing anybody's personel research results.. 8)
And why wasn't there any testing on a regular pipe in this study?
And joint potency seems to increase exponentionally with more pot per joint, 'case it burns slower. But then the same is true with bigger bowls of pot. I think the mathimaticians should be on this.

Mr Green

Interesting....

mr g

TonDerudesKa

Hmmmm. to quote mr g.."Interesting". Having been a chronic smoker for 30 years...I always thought the bong worked best....maybe it was just my imagination
I wonder if they could appreciate any human help.

Cajunyank

SargerasDragon

I guess now that I am a fairly experienced pot smoker (and that there is FINALLY a headshop here, and I could get a REAL bong), I'de have to say if a person can develop their bong technique properly, the bong would be best.. However, you know when you get a big bag of shwag, the thing to do is roll a bunch of big, phatty joints? What does it all mean?!

-Sargey